Martin Gardner died last Saturday, provoking a round of reminiscences from the skeptical community. There’s been a fair amount of talk about Gardner’s status as the odd theist out within the skeptic movement. In a comment at Phil Plait’s blog, James Randi gave a nice, succinct explanation of Gardner’s stance (HT Massimo Pigliucci): Martin was [...]
Category Archives: epistemology
Martin Gardner’s fideism, and related epistemological ponderings
Pigliucci on accomodationism
Massimo Pigliucci has decided to weigh in on the debate over accommodationism that has been happening in the atheist blogosphere for forever now, coming down on the side of the accomodationists. Unlike Mooney and Nisbet, Pigliucci is clear that he’s interested in matters of philosophical principle, not tactics. (Mooney and Nisbet, in contrast, may well [...]
Luke’s reply
Luke Prog has replied to my comments on things he’s said about epistemology. If you want to see where this discussion goes, I’ll continue it over at his blog.
Luke on reformed epistemology and moral realism
In his blogging, Luke of Common Sense Atheism has made some fairly harsh, and largely unexplained, swipes at reformed epistemology (Alvin Plantinga’s project of trying to show we can accept Christian doctrine without any argument or evidence for doing so), saying things like “reformed epistemology is neither” and that it is a “Candidate for ‘Dumbest [...]