Letters to Doubting Thomas (a review)
March 1, 2010 by Chris Hallquist
Filed under epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, philosophy, religion, reviews
When Lukeprog posted his Ultimate Truth Seeker Challenge, I read over his reading list and saw that it was mostly books I had already read. But I put my name down anyway, because I figured the books I hadn’t read would be a good way to round out my philosophy of religion reading, and reviewing [...]
Continue Reading »Avatarand weird human impulses
January 16, 2010 by Chris Hallquist
Filed under mind, religion, reviews
I’m really late to the “explaining the meaning of James Cameron’s Avatar” game–I saw it over winter break, then got absorbed in other “fun winter break things,” then got absorbed in the re-start of grad school. But here it goes: First, yes, Avatar is indeed pretty, so much so that I disagree with the people [...]
Continue Reading »Why Fight Club is better than Choke (review)
November 23, 2009 by Chris Hallquist
Filed under philosophy, reviews, social and literary criticism
Lots of writers put out a great novel early in their career and go downhill from there. The reasons are hard to pinpoint, admitting of only the most general explanations: Maybe it’s because humans are only allotted one book’s worth of truly good ideas for fiction, and after that it’s repeat yourself or dip into [...]
Continue Reading »Marriage, morals, and the green-eyed monster
October 15, 2009 by Chris Hallquist
Filed under Bertrand Russell, ethics, mind, people, philosophy, reviews, social and literary criticism
Atheist perspectives on sexual morality
Recently, I finally got around to picking up a copy of Bertrand Russell’s Marriage and Morals, the notorious book that played a major part of the campaign to get him barred from teaching in New York. I also had brought to my attention a Richard Dawkins piece on sexual jealousy from [...]
In Defense of Food Isn’t About Nutrition (a review)
September 17, 2009 by Chris Hallquist
Filed under biology, reviews, science, social and literary criticism, stupidity
In In Defense of Food, Michael Pollan proposes a radical new approach to diet: ignore everything you’ve ever heard about scientific nutrition, and just build a diet of only non-processed foods, with little or no meat. This advice is summed up in a short, pleasing slogan: “Eat Food. Not Too Much. Mostly Plants.” And you [...]
Continue Reading »