Category Archives: Stephen J. Gould

Science books: what are they good for?

Posted by Chris Hallquist on November 17, 2009 Comments Off

Chris Mooney has a nice post up debunking Stephen Meyer on the history of science and the value of peer review. I’ll pile on here: even if scientific revolutions are important, this isn’t a problem for peer review. I work in philosophy, where people often try to strike out in radically new directions (say, in [...]