Craig on the Ontological and (Leibnizian) Cosmological Arguments
March 8, 2010
Filed under G. E. Leibniz, William Lane Craig, metaphysics, people, philosophy, religion
Recently, I’ve been looking over the third edition of William Lane Craig’s Reasonable Faith, as well as the textbook he wrote with J.P. Moreland, Philosophical Foundations of a Christian Worldview. One thing these books have that’s missing from a lot of Craig’s works is an attempt to defend, in some detail, arguments that he usually [...]
Continue Reading »William Lane Craig is… er…
March 5, 2010
Filed under William Lane Craig, people, philosophy, religion, stupidity
… a poor hermeneuticist. Let me leave it at that, since I’m about to reviews my Secular Web review of his book, and Keith Augustine (the SecWeb library editor) thinks being important is polite.
What prompted this post is seeing how, in his essay for the anthology God is Great, God is Good, Craig that this [...]
Letters to Doubting Thomas (a review)
March 1, 2010
Filed under epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, philosophy, religion, reviews
When Lukeprog posted his Ultimate Truth Seeker Challenge, I read over his reading list and saw that it was mostly books I had already read. But I put my name down anyway, because I figured the books I hadn’t read would be a good way to round out my philosophy of religion reading, and reviewing [...]
Continue Reading »I’m on Google buzz, I think
February 27, 2010
Filed under admin
I’ve never quite seen the point of signing up for Twitter, but when Google buzz came out, I realized I could use it without going to the trouble of signing up for anything, and it would make a good repository for random thoughts and links that really have no business going up on the blog. [...]
Continue Reading »Lee Strobel responds
February 23, 2010
Filed under Lee Strobel, people, religion
Lee Strobel (or someone purporting to be him; I can’t actually verify the identity) has posted a comment at AiG BUSTED:
With all due respect, this characterization of my spiritual journey is selective, misleading and inaccurate. To suggest that I was so emotionally enthralled by a visit to church that I then simply read Christian apologists [...]