<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Uncredible Hallq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net</link>
	<description>Best blog name ever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:01:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Letters to Doubting Thomas (a review) by Common Sense Atheism &#187; Updates on the Debunking Christianity / Ultimate Truth-Seeker Challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/03/01/letters-to-doubting-thomas-a-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5992</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense Atheism &#187; Updates on the Debunking Christianity / Ultimate Truth-Seeker Challenge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1076#comment-5992</guid>
		<description>[...] Hallquist (atheist) just finished Letters to Doubting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hallquist (atheist) just finished Letters to Doubting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m on Google buzz, I think by indygwyn</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/27/im-on-google-buzz-i-think/comment-page-1/#comment-5991</link>
		<dc:creator>indygwyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1079#comment-5991</guid>
		<description>I found ya, Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found ya, Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lee Strobel responds by jblanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/23/lee-strobel-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-5990</link>
		<dc:creator>jblanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1073#comment-5990</guid>
		<description>Fine. I should say, I actually find &lt;i&gt;The Case for Christ&lt;/i&gt; far more tolerable than I repeatedly let on in public and private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine. I should say, I actually find <i>The Case for Christ</i> far more tolerable than I repeatedly let on in public and private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lee Strobel responds by Chris Hallquist</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/23/lee-strobel-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-5989</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hallquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1073#comment-5989</guid>
		<description>Be nice, Josh. I really am hoping to be able to have a dialog with Lee here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be nice, Josh. I really am hoping to be able to have a dialog with Lee here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lee Strobel responds by jblanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/23/lee-strobel-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-5988</link>
		<dc:creator>jblanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1073#comment-5988</guid>
		<description>I like the sentence &quot;Please don’t inadvertently misrepresent what happened.&quot; A very hard request to grant on purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the sentence &#8220;Please don’t inadvertently misrepresent what happened.&#8221; A very hard request to grant on purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no Lee Strobel by aigbusted</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/17/there-is-no-lee-strobel/comment-page-1/#comment-5987</link>
		<dc:creator>aigbusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1056#comment-5987</guid>
		<description>Apparently Lee Strobel himself has shown up to comment on my blog. I say apparently because it is the internet, and it could be an impersonator. But I doubt it. Here is what he said:

With all due respect, this characterization of my spiritual journey is selective, misleading and inaccurate. To suggest that I was so emotionally enthralled by a visit to church that I then simply read Christian apologists “to assure [myself] it was all true” is to simply rewrite history. My “Unchurched Harry and Mary” and “Case” books are entirely consistent, as any fair reading of them will establish. I was an atheist who thoroughly investigated both sides of the issue and concluded that the weight of the evidence supports Christianity. My “Case” books focus on experts whose arguments I ultimately found to be the most persuasive. Please don’t inadvertently misrepresent what happened. Many thanks, Lee Strobel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently Lee Strobel himself has shown up to comment on my blog. I say apparently because it is the internet, and it could be an impersonator. But I doubt it. Here is what he said:</p>
<p>With all due respect, this characterization of my spiritual journey is selective, misleading and inaccurate. To suggest that I was so emotionally enthralled by a visit to church that I then simply read Christian apologists “to assure [myself] it was all true” is to simply rewrite history. My “Unchurched Harry and Mary” and “Case” books are entirely consistent, as any fair reading of them will establish. I was an atheist who thoroughly investigated both sides of the issue and concluded that the weight of the evidence supports Christianity. My “Case” books focus on experts whose arguments I ultimately found to be the most persuasive. Please don’t inadvertently misrepresent what happened. Many thanks, Lee Strobel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no Lee Strobel by Chris Hallquist</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/17/there-is-no-lee-strobel/comment-page-1/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hallquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1056#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>The link to Ryan&#039;s post, for whoever wants to read it, is:

http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2010/02/re-there-is-no-lee-strobel.html

It adds on some nice examples, people should read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link to Ryan&#8217;s post, for whoever wants to read it, is:</p>
<p><a href="http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2010/02/re-there-is-no-lee-strobel.html" rel="nofollow">http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2010/02/re-there-is-no-lee-strobel.html</a></p>
<p>It adds on some nice examples, people should read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no Lee Strobel by aigbusted</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/17/there-is-no-lee-strobel/comment-page-1/#comment-5984</link>
		<dc:creator>aigbusted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1056#comment-5984</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve written a response to this post and have scheduled it to post on my blog early Sunday morning:

http://aigbusted.blogspot.com

Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written a response to this post and have scheduled it to post on my blog early Sunday morning:</p>
<p><a href="http://aigbusted.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://aigbusted.blogspot.com</a></p>
<p>Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no Lee Strobel by jblanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/17/there-is-no-lee-strobel/comment-page-1/#comment-5983</link>
		<dc:creator>jblanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1056#comment-5983</guid>
		<description>Well I just hope there aren&#039;t people like Lee Strobel in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I just hope there aren&#8217;t people like Lee Strobel in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on There is no Lee Strobel by Chris Hallquist</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2010/02/17/there-is-no-lee-strobel/comment-page-1/#comment-5982</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hallquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=1056#comment-5982</guid>
		<description>Barker was a fundamentalist preacher who slowly moved through liberal Christianity eventually to atheism. In his book, he talks about conflict with the people hiring him to preach, with him trying to limit his sermons to &quot;be a good person&quot; material as much as he thought he could get away with, and eventually feeling like a coward because he found himself preaching to an audience that was all excited because they had gotten their one village atheist--a guy who wasn&#039;t at all afraid to tell people what he believed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barker was a fundamentalist preacher who slowly moved through liberal Christianity eventually to atheism. In his book, he talks about conflict with the people hiring him to preach, with him trying to limit his sermons to &#8220;be a good person&#8221; material as much as he thought he could get away with, and eventually feeling like a coward because he found himself preaching to an audience that was all excited because they had gotten their one village atheist&#8211;a guy who wasn&#8217;t at all afraid to tell people what he believed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
