Category Archives: language

Tone vs. Content

Russell Blackford has a post arguing that tone is important, even if a lot of the things people say about tone are foolish: For these sorts of reasons, intelligent discussion of tone is always in order. The problem is likely to be that a lot of discussion of tone is just not very intelligent – [...]

Playing games with “truth”

PZ Myers highlights a quote from Irving Kristol, a big fan of Leo Strauss’ political philosophy: “There are different kinds of truths for different kinds of people,” he says in an interview. “There are truths appropriate for children; truths that are appropriate for students; truths that are appropriate for educated adults; and truths that are [...]

“God,” real meanings, and useful meanings

Yesterday, Jerry Coyne spotted yet another exampleof something that I see quite a bit: accusations that prominent atheists believe that literalism is the true form of religion. Though talk of literalism is misleading, there’s also an issue of whether leading atheists have made any claims at all about the “real” form of religion. Jerry Coyne [...]

Refusing to believe (anything at all)

When did people get the idea that tolerance means not having any strong opinions on anything? I occasionally made fun of this at my old blog, but I recently stumbled across a more extreme example: one of the things that struck me about Karen Armstrong’s The Case for God (aside from the butchering of Aquinas [...]

Random links

It’s been too long since I’ve done this…