I’ve written before about the relationship between content and tone, but there’s an angle I didn’t cover there: when people respond to criticisms of their content by saying “he shouldn’t complain about my tone because…” For example, here’s Ed Feser: Rosenhouse has a helluva nerve complaining about my aggressive tone. In the post that began [...]
Category Archives: dishonesty
Biblical scholars are not a bunch of baffled skeptics (also: Craig lies about Ehrman)
Posted by Chris Hallquist on June 10, 2011
12 comments
William Lane Craig would like you to believe that Biblical scholarship is made up of people who accept that all the major details of the Biblical story of Jesus’ resurrection are facts, who accept that there is no good non-miraculous explanation for those facts, and if they reject the resurrection do so only out of [...]
How William Lane Craig misleads his followers
Posted by Chris Hallquist on June 3, 2011
26 comments
Ever since going to the Harris-Craig debate, Craig has been on my mind an awful lot. There’s one thing I’ve alluded to here and here, and meant to do a post on, but kept putting off: the fact that Craig works very hard to give his followers a false impression of the facts on key [...]
More on Luke’s endorsement of William Lane Craig
Posted by Chris Hallquist on May 25, 2011
5 comments
I’ve said that I don’t think William Lane Craig deserves the praise that Luke Muehlhauser has heaped on him. But in my previous post on the subject, I said have less than I could have about why I’m not impressed with Craig. In particular, I didn’t respond to the many specific points Luke has made [...]
William Lane Craig is a charlatan
Posted by Chris Hallquist on February 23, 2011
18 comments
Oh my science. From Luke Muehlhauser: Honestly, in a lot of debates with atheists, it’s William Lane Craig who is being more logical and more faithful to the arguments than the atheist opponent is. A lot of that just has to do with the fact that he’s better philosophically trained, so he thinks like a [...]