I’ve spent the last few days drafting a post on Craig Keener’s book Miracles. It ended up being the second-longest book review I’ve ever written, which I don’t mind, but it also ended up rather disorganized, which I do mind, so I’m going to hold off posting until I can re-write it. Until then: anyone [...]
Monthly Archives: December 2011
Next week I will write about present-day miracle claims, I promise
Great Christian thinkers
I’ve previously written, in reference to Ed Feser: I agree that Leprechaunology is not a great analogy for the work of Aquinas or Leibniz. But it’s easy to suggest better analogies: how about Spinozism or Hegelianism? I’d be surprised if Feser took either of those doctrines terribly seriously. The dirty little secret of philosophy is [...]
What is objective morality anyway?
I’m not a huge Michael Ruse fan. Scratch that, I’m not any kind of Michael Ruse fan. However, after seeing a friend criticize this for supposedly being consistent about moral realism/anti-realism, I’m starting to wonder if Ruse has a point about morality. This is because there are several different questions we could be talking about [...]
I’ll take Alvin Plantinga over John Haught any day
Jerry Coyne, last week: Alvin Plantinga, like John Haught, is regarded as a sophisticated and serious theologian. (Although he’s formally a Christian philosopher at the University of Notre Dame, he’s published lots of books defending God, engaging in apologetics, and so on, so there’s little doubt he qualifies as a theologian.) This made me wince. [...]
Plantinga’s inexcusable faults (review of Where The Conflict Really Lies)
I don’t expect Plantinga’s fans to ever totally agree with my negative assessment of Plantinga. My disagreements with them are too big. For one thing, I assume most of Plantinga’s fans think that what academic philosophers do is generally worthwhile, where as I don’t think that. But I hope that even fans of academic philosophy [...]