Monthly Archives: January 2009

The drinking age and drunk driving

At The Volokh Conspiracy, Philip Cook argues lowering the drinking age would lead to increased abuse, but we should do it anyway (HT: Sully). His main piece of evidence is an increase in highway fatalities back when some states lowered their drinking ages, plus a vague gesture towards “other indications of increased abuse.” Without a [...]

Good article on FoxNews.com

When I showed her this, my girlfriend asked if I had alerted the respectable media. Actually, I found it via Ed Brayton’s blog, which has gotten some wonderful guest-bloggers while Ed goes off to Vegas to gamble. Also from one of Ed’s guests is a post on Obama’s decision not to investigate Bush war crimes. [...]

In defense of Orwell, take II

Okay, so AnlamK has asked me to read a Language Log criticism of Orwell’s _Politics and the English Language_titled “Orwell’s Liar” and respond. After doing a search of my own blog, I realized I had gotten into some of the same arguments with a different Language Log writer four months ago. When I first sat [...]

What the fuck is uncivility?

A couple days ago PZ put up a post on the over-done issue of “civility” in the blogging world. I had to pause and wonder what exactly people are complaining about. I read through the first hundred comments. This being PZ’s place, few were in defense of civility, but on the few there were: The [...]

Review: Paul K. Moser’s _The Elusive God_

This week, I’ve decided to take a break from reviewing books that specifically deal with Dawkins et al. and look at a book on religious epistemology with no particular target: Paul K. Moser’s _The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology_. The presentation can be clumsy and confusing at times, but it provides some interesting variants on [...]