<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The humble side of the debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2009/11/17/the-humble-side-of-the-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2009/11/17/the-humble-side-of-the-debate/</link>
	<description>Best blog name ever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:27:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: There is no Lee Strobel : The Uncredible Hallq</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2009/11/17/the-humble-side-of-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5978</link>
		<dc:creator>There is no Lee Strobel : The Uncredible Hallq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=847#comment-5978</guid>
		<description>[...] as far as I can see. His rhetoric tends to fall into the category of &#8220;we must believe this because it&#8217;s polite to believe it.&#8221; And the evidence tends to point in the other direction. There are lots of atheist who can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as far as I can see. His rhetoric tends to fall into the category of &#8220;we must believe this because it&#8217;s polite to believe it.&#8221; And the evidence tends to point in the other direction. There are lots of atheist who can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Blanchard</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2009/11/17/the-humble-side-of-the-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-5816</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Blanchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/?p=847#comment-5816</guid>
		<description>I think there&#039;s at least one sense in which this criticism could be valuable - if some kind of epistemic humility is taken to be relevant in the context of, say, a virtue approach to epistemology. Perhaps epistemic humility is a virtue we ought to cultivate, and one we need to cultivate in order to better evaluate religious belief.

Incidentally I think religious believers violate principles of epistemic humility constantly - both in the details and extent of their religious beliefs, and in their generalizations about rival belief systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there&#8217;s at least one sense in which this criticism could be valuable &#8211; if some kind of epistemic humility is taken to be relevant in the context of, say, a virtue approach to epistemology. Perhaps epistemic humility is a virtue we ought to cultivate, and one we need to cultivate in order to better evaluate religious belief.</p>
<p>Incidentally I think religious believers violate principles of epistemic humility constantly &#8211; both in the details and extent of their religious beliefs, and in their generalizations about rival belief systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

