Comments on: Obama’s stimulus rhetoric

By: Matt Nisbet is pretty much full of shit : The Uncredible Hallq

Matt Nisbet is pretty much full of shit : The Uncredible Hallq — Fri, 08 May 2009 19:15:32 +0000

[...] of the wrong political cause (it would be unethical to use framing to help out Barack Obama, who is slime), but what’s wrong with using it in [...]

By: Chris Hallquist

Chris Hallquist — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:02:21 +0000

Josh, now I’m curious: what posts don’t you agree with, and why not?

By: Christine

Christine — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:08:00 +0000

p.s. i think i’m moving to Switzerland if they’ll take me. at least they have their banks figured out and don’t tax any income

By: Christine

Christine — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:06:52 +0000

I hear ya. He says the same things as Bush, just in a coherent and eloquent manner. I’ll give him points for that. But how is this third “spend a crap load of money we don’t have” bill any different than the ones passed with the Bush ruled the roost? The bill is 837 billion dollars, all of it will be borrowed from China, our new national “america likes to screw itself” banker. Of that 837 billion, there will be 400 billion in interest added on as we pay it back over time. Besides that, only 30,000 jobs will be created. That is the slimy part. It “keeps” more jobs than 30,000, but does not create any more than 30,000. I’m not sure how anyone knows which jobs would have disappeared without the massive spending bill. Maybe they have a crystal ball in the White House.

By: Josh

Josh — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:49:47 +0000

a post that I agree with!