<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confusion on Biblical authority</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2008/07/31/confusion-on-biblical-authority/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2008/07/31/confusion-on-biblical-authority/</link>
	<description>Best blog name ever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:27:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Borah</title>
		<link>http://www.uncrediblehallq.net/2008/07/31/confusion-on-biblical-authority/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Borah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncrediblehallq.net/blog/?p=98#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s just a pragmatic thing. There is a powerful argument to be made that you shouldn&#039;t take the Biblical authors as infallible. But even if an evangelical refuses to budge on that point, it&#039;s helpful to have a backup argument that is compatible with infallibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just a pragmatic thing. There is a powerful argument to be made that you shouldn&#8217;t take the Biblical authors as infallible. But even if an evangelical refuses to budge on that point, it&#8217;s helpful to have a backup argument that is compatible with infallibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

